Toggle Menu

留学生契约理论作业辅导

发布时间: 2023-04-22 09:26:55
文章来源: 考而思
摘要:
卢梭社会契约论I think the biggest problem at the heart of Rousseau s social contract theory is the way he deals with individuality. His social contract says that if an individual disagrees with the general will then they

关于留学生作业辅导的问题之前小编给同学们说过,同学们如果自己能力以及时间完成还是要自己去努力完成哦,虽然现在的dx机构越来越多,但是其中风险相信很多同学都知道,尤其是国外的大学,对于学术诚信是十分看重的,有些同学因为论文作业抄袭而导致拿不到毕业证甚至退学,真的是非常非常可惜,dx有风险,同学们一定要谨慎对待。

我认为卢梭社会契约论的核心最大的问题是他处理个性的方式。他的社会契约说,如果一个人不同意共同意志,那么他一定是错的,为了自己的利益,他必须被迫服从共同意志。

卢梭说,如果有人拒绝服从大众意志他就会被整个身体强迫服从;这就是说,他将被迫获得自由。密尔无疑会认为这种强制性的服从是多数人的暴政,因为他坚信个性是需要保护的激情信念是需要保护和培养的。

正因如此,这篇文章表明了他对他认为社会压制不一致的看法的厌恶。通过这个卢梭认为这确保了一个社会不会依赖于任何一个人。和卢梭一样,密尔也谈到了一种公民或社会自由;然而,与卢梭不同的是,他不推测自然状态。密尔认为他的理论是基于功利主义的,而不是自然状态和公民社会的比较。

我认为密尔的论点更有说服力,因为他没有假设我们有自然权利。密尔似乎不认为我们有自然权利,即使我们有,卢梭也没有告诉我们,我们如何能确定它们是什么。卢梭似乎认为我们有一种内在的自由存在于自然状态中,他想将个人自由与公民社会相结合。

留学生契约理论作业辅导

卢梭社会契约论

I think the biggest problem at the heart of Rousseau s social contract theory is the way he deals with individuality. His social contract says that if an individual disagrees with the general will then they must be wrong, and for their own good they must be forced to conform to the general will. Rousseau says that if anyone refuses to obey the general will he will be compelled to do so by the whole body; which means nothing else than that he will be forced to be free 6. Mill would undoubtedly consider such forced conformity a tyranny of the majority because of his strong belief that individuality is something that should be protected passionate belief that individuality is something that should be protected and nurtured. As such, the essay illustrates his disgust at how he believed society squelches nonconformity.Through this Rousseau thinks that this makes sure a society will not depend upon any one person.Like Rousseau, Mill talks about a type of civil or social freedom; however, unlike Rousseau he doesn t speculate about a state of nature . Rather, Mill’states that his theory is justified by utilitarianism and not a comparison between a state of nature and civil society. I think Mill’s argument is more persuasive because he isn t making an assumption that we have natural rights . Mill doesn t seem to think we have natural rights, and even if we do, Rousseau doesn t tell us how we can be certain of what they are. Rousseau appears to think we have an intrinsic freedom that exists in the state of nature, and he wants to merge the individual liberty one supposedly has in the state of nature with civil society.

以上便是小编分享的内容,需要留学生作业辅导/补习的同学可以直接添加小管家微信哦~我们是专业的海外课程学术辅导中心,和各国很多院校以及学联、国家级的考试委员会等官方组织都有合作。我们致力于解决留学生同学们在留学之路上遇到的一切学术难题,且师资力量雄厚,教师团队都是各国top100的名校毕业,有多年辅导经验。都分布于全球,可以做到无时差自定义时间上课,以及双语或全英授课。

凡来源标注“考而思”均为考而思原创文章,版权均属考而思教育所以,任何媒体、网站或个人不得转载,否则追究法律责任。

16年深耕全阶段留学辅导   数十万留学生信赖

添加微信:「 kaoersi03 」备注官网申请试听,享专属套餐优惠!

同步课件辅导、作业补习、论文润色、真题讲解、Appeal申诉、入学内测/面试培训


添加微信【kaoersi03】(备注官网)申请试听,享专属套餐优惠!

客服微信

kaoersi03

课程听不懂?作业不会写?复习没方向?专业老师为您答疑解惑

复制成功

微信号: kaoersi03

备注“官网”享专属套餐优惠!