ENGR90033课程作业辅导：实习生的学习经历

　　NGR90033 – Internship: Student Guide

　　10 Task 4 – Final Report

　　The Final Report is a detailed analysis of the learning experience that has been your internship. It will

　　explain your role in the host organisation, what has been accomplished, and what has been have learnt.

　　10.1 Length, submission and marks

　　• The Final Report must be no more than 8000 words in total. The Final Report should consist of the

　　following:

　　o An executive summary (maximum 400 words)

　　o The body of the report – the introduction to the conclusion, inclusive (maximum 5000

　　words)

　　o The appendices

　　It is expected that most students will write around 4000 words for the body of the report.

　　o It is expected that students will typically spend approximately 25 hours on the report to

　　achieve a passing mark.

　　• The Final Report is to be submitted using Turnitin through the subject LMS site.

　　• The Final Report is worth 50% of the subject mark.

　　• The Final Report will receive a mark out of 100.

　　10.2 Audience

　　Your Final Report will only be read by the Melbourne School of Engineering academic and coordination

　　staff. This will allow you to fully express yourself in relation to your personal and professional

　　development. Information reported in your Final Report will not be shared with your employer or student

　　peers.

　　10.3 Description

　　Your internship has been a rare opportunity to experience the industry environment while still studying.

　　Within this environment you have been given responsibilities, performed work to benefit others and

　　interacted with a wide range of people. The Final Report is a deep reflection on this experience. If done

　　properly you will better understand what you have learnt and can use this learning in the future,

　　particularly when you begin seeking graduate employment.

　　The objective of your report is to inform your reader:

　　• about the environment you worked in and the role that you held;

　　• how the communication and teamwork requirements differ between an industry environment and

　　a university environment;

　　• how you applied your university learning; and

　　• how you developed your communication and other professional skills.

　　Your report is expected to be a demonstration of your written communication capability. It should be clear,

　　concise, focused and informative.

　　10.3.1 Appendices – Engagement Reports

　　The Engagement Reports do not have to be included in your appendices. These should only be included if

　　they are referred to by the main body of your report.

　　ENGR90033 – Internship: Student Guide

　　Melbourne School of Engineering Date:7/03/2018, Version: 1.01

　　The University of Melbourne Victoria 3010 Australia Page 31 of 44

　　W: www.eng.unimelb.edu.au

　　10.3.2 Template

　　A template is available for you to use and is accessible on the LMS:

　　Final Report Template.docx

　　It is not compulsory for you to use the template, but it is highly recommended as you must include the

　　described information in an easily accessible format.

　　10.4 Assessment

　　10.4.1 Assessment criteria

　　Criteria Outline of what is sought

　　Role

　　(20%)

　　A clear explanation of the following and how they interrelate:

　　1. Your role and how it fitted within your team and management structure.

　　2. How the organization’s structure or structures differ to those in your university

　　environment and the significance of this.

　　3. The tasks you were engaged in and your associated achievements.

　　4. The impact of the work you were involved in, in relation to both your host

　　organization and other stakeholders.

　　5. The quality, information and other management systems used in your host

　　organization, why they were used and how they impacted the work that you

　　did.

　　6. The sources of information you used to complete your work within your host

　　organisation, how they were sourced and your confidence in them.

　　Knowledge and

　　Methods

　　(20%)

　　A clear explanation of the key skills, knowledge and methods that you have used to do

　　the following:

　　1. Solve complex technical problems set within broad contextual constraints.

　　2. Conduct and manage technical projects3

　　.

　　As well as an explanation of:

　　3. How you have applied and developed these skills.

　　4. What related skills you will need to develop before becoming an effective

　　practicing engineer

　　This criterion directly relates to the EA competencies associated with Engineering

　　Application Ability (2.1, 2.3 & 2.4) and the related C&IS graduate attributes.

　　3 These may be “projects” of any size, typically for interns these will range from individual tasks assigned to you, to

　　small team projects. Conducting and managing may involve multiple tasks.

　　ENGR90033 – Internship: Student Guide

　　Melbourne School of Engineering Date:7/03/2018, Version: 1.01

　　The University of Melbourne Victoria 3010 Australia Page 32 of 44

　　W: www.eng.unimelb.edu.au

　　Criteria Outline of what is sought

　　Professional

　　Skills

　　(25%)

　　A clear explanation of the professional skills and personal attributes that you have used

　　and experienced, required to:

　　1. Operate in a team environment.

　　2. Communicate effectively within an industry context.

　　3. Effectively work with clients/stakeholders.

　　As well as an explanation of:

　　4. How you have applied and developed these skills.

　　5. How the application of these skills impacts engineering work.

　　6. What related skills you will need to develop before becoming an effective

　　practicing engineer.

　　7. Observed behaviours and actions that impacted on your team’s ability to be

　　successful and the related longer-term impacts on projects.

　　This section directly relates to the EA competencies associated with Professional and

　　Personal Attributes and the related C&IS graduate attributes

　　Structure and

　　Readability

　　(30%)

　　The Final Report should be:

　　• logical and cohesive;

　　• clear of objective with a strong narrative;

　　• concise and complete;

　　• easily understood; and

　　• easily navigated.

　　Figures and tables should be used where they aid understanding.

　　Executive

　　Summary

　　(5%)

　　The Executive Summary should offer a succinct overview of the report. It should

　　summarise your objective, your conclusion and the key points of your report.

　　ENGR90033 – Internship: Student Guide

　　Melbourne School of Engineering Date:7/03/2018, Version: 1.01

　　The University of Melbourne Victoria 3010 Australia Page 33 of 44

　　W: www.eng.unimelb.edu.au

　　10.4.2 Assessment rubric

　　POOR (0–49%) PASS (50–59%) GOOD (60 – 69%) EXCELLENT (70 – 89%) OUTSTANDING (90 – 100%)

　　Role (20%)

　　Addresses the Role criterion

　　items in a superficial and

　　disparate way with no significant

　　interconnectedness.

　　Addresses all of the Role

　　criterion items, with

　　reasonable detail on the

　　descriptive components such

　　as role and tasks but with

　　little insight on the impact

　　and context ones. Some

　　interconnectedness identified.

　　Addresses all of the Role criterion

　　items with some detail and insight.

　　How the items interconnect with each

　　other is discussed in a basic but useful

　　way. Reasonable examples are used to

　　illustrate points.

　　As “Good” with a strong

　　understanding of how the

　　items interconnect and impact

　　on each other. Responses to

　　impact and rationale show

　　good insight. Examples are

　　detailed and useful.

　　As “Excellent” with deep

　　connections to the

　　student’s personal

　　internship experience.

　　Examples are well

　　thought out and explored

　　in detail demonstrating

　　good insight.

　　Knowledge and Methods (20%)

　　Skills, knowledge and methods

　　are identified in a superficial

　　manner, with limited discussion

　　of application and development.

　　Skills, knowledge and

　　methods are discussed in a

　　general way with some detail.

　　Application and development

　　are addressed but lack insight

　　with only basic examples.

　　Skills, knowledge and methods are

　　discussed in a specific and detailed

　　way. Application and development are

　　addressed in detail with reasonable

　　examples. The links between skills,

　　knowledge, methods, application and

　　development are explored. Reasonable

　　understanding of EA competencies/CIS

　　grad. attributes is demonstrated.

　　As “Good” with good examples,

　　a strong understanding of

　　personal development required

　　and detailed references to past

　　study and learning. Good

　　understanding of EA

　　competencies/CIS grad.

　　attributes is demonstrated.

　　As “Excellent” with good

　　insight into the links

　　between skills,

　　knowledge, methods,

　　application and

　　development. Response

　　is closely linked to

　　student’s personal

　　internship experience.

　　Professional Skills (25%)

　　Skills and attributes are

　　identified in a superficial

　　manner, with limited discussion

　　of application, impact and

　　development.

　　Skills and attributes are

　　discussed in a general way

　　with some detail. Application,

　　impact and development are

　　addressed but lack insight

　　with only basic examples.

　　Limited observation

　　demonstrated.

　　Skills and attributes are discussed in a

　　specific and detailed way. Application,

　　impact and development are

　　addressed in detail with reasonable

　　examples. The links between skills,

　　attributes, application, impact and

　　development are explored.

　　Observations are reasonable.

　　Reasonable understanding of EA

　　competencies/CIS grad. attributes is

　　demonstrated.

　　As “Good” with strong

　　examples and good insight into

　　the impact of professional

　　skills. Understanding of

　　personal development

　　requirements is good.

　　Observations demonstrate

　　insight. Good understanding of

　　EA competencies/CIS grad.

　　attributes is demonstrated.

　　As “Excellent” with good

　　insight into the links

　　between skills, attributes,

　　impact, application and

　　development. Response

　　is closely linked to

　　student’s personal

　　internship experience.

　　ENGR90033 – Internship: Student Guide

　　Melbourne School of Engineering Date:7/03/2018, Version: 1.01

　　The University of Melbourne Victoria 3010 Australia Page 34 of 44

　　W: www.eng.unimelb.edu.au

　　POOR (0–49%) PASS (50–59%) GOOD (60 – 69%) EXCELLENT (70 – 89%) OUTSTANDING (90 – 100%)

　　Structure and Readability (30%)

　　Ideas are not connected

　　(coherence) and content flows

　　poorly (cohesion). May be largely

　　written in a question and answer

　　form. Objective of the document

　　is unclear. Redundant and

　　repeated content, while key

　　information is absent.

　　May have multiple problems

　　with grammar, spelling and

　　expression. Difficult to navigate

　　due to missing elements or poor

　　headings.

　　No figures/tables used,

　　inappropriate, poorly designed

　　or poorly explained.

　　Reasonable coherence and

　　cohesion. Flows like a report.

　　Objective is clear but may not

　　be fully achieved or properly

　　aligned with task. Some

　　redundancy may be present

　　or required information

　　missing.

　　Few grammatical, spelling and

　　expression mistakes. Headings

　　are reasonable and navigation

　　elements are present.

　　Figures/tables are generally

　　included where useful, with

　　reasonable design and basic

　　explanations.

　　Referencing generally used

　　where required.

　　Good coherence and cohesion.

　　Objective is clear, achieved and

　　appropriate. Minimal redundancy and

　　all key information is provided.

　　Included appendices are referred to

　　and useful.

　　Minimal grammatical, spelling and

　　expression mistakes. Evidence of proof

　　reading.

　　Good clear headings with all navigation

　　elements present (page #, Table of

　　Contents).

　　Figures/tables are used where helpful,

　　and are generally well designed, well

　　explained, and appropriate.

　　Referencing used as required.

　　As “Good” with excellent

　　coherence and cohesion,

　　maintaining a strong narrative

　　throughout the document.

　　Content is well thought out;

　　clearly and concisely achieving

　　the report’s objective.

　　Strong evidence of repeated

　　review, with negligible mistakes

　　in grammar, spelling and

　　expression.

　　Overall presentation is at a

　　professional standard.

　　Figures/tables used are of an

　　excellent standard and closely

　　linked to content.

　　Figures/tables are used in all

　　key areas where they would aid

　　understanding.

　　As “Excellent” with all

　　elements coming

　　together to make the

　　document clear,

　　interesting and enjoyable

　　to read.

　　Standard is equivalent of

　　a professional report that

　　has been carefully and

　　repeatedly reviewed.

　　Exec. Summary (5%)

　　Executive summary is missing

　　key information such as the

　　conclusion or objective.

　　Executive summary

　　summarises most of the key

　　points but contains significant

　　unnecessary content.

　　Maximum mark if executive

　　summary word limit

　　exceeded.

　　Executive summary addresses all the

　　key points but may contain some

　　unnecessary content.

　　Executive summary provides a

　　mostly clear summary of the

　　key content without containing

　　unnecessary content.

　　Executive summary

　　provides a complete,

　　clear and concise

　　overview of the report.

　　ENGR90033 – Internship: Student Guide

　　Melbourne School of Engineering Date:7/03/2018, Version: 1.01

　　The University of Melbourne Victoria 3010 Australia Page 35 of 44

　　W: www.eng.unimelb.edu.au

　　10.4.3 Assessment penalties

　　The following penalties are applicable to the Final Report. The minimum mark is 0.

　　1. Submission requirements

　　a. Incorrect file format = -10 marks

　　b. Missing fields on the cover sheet = -5 marks

　　c. Missing cover sheet = -10 marks

　　d. Main body over 5000 words = Only first 5000 words assessed and -10 marks

　　e. Submission over 8000 words = Only first 8000 words assessed and -10 marks (-5 marks if

　　main body is also over 5000 words)

　　f. Executive summary over 400 words = Maximum limit on mark for Executive Summary

　　criterion

　　g. Late = -10 marks per day for up to 5 days after which the submission will not be accepted